#59
Runaway pitch angle scattering through resonant interaction with the toroidal magnetic field ripple in TCV
Oral
Tijs Wijkamp (Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research)
M. Hoppe, J. Decker, B.P. Duval, A. Perek, U. Sheikh, I.G.J. Classen, R.J.E. Jaspers and the TCV team
Abstract
Design of runaway electron mitigation strategies for reactor scale machines relies on present-day experiments. Therein, analysis is aided by the availability of diagnostics that are sensitive to the spatio-temporal runaway energy distribution. Filtered visible light camera imaging of synchrotron emission in Tokamak à configuration variable (TCV) [1] was previously used to infer the most strongly radiating part of the distribution [2]. The inferred large pitch angles (0.5 rad) could not be explained just considering electric field acceleration, particle collisions and radial transport [1].
Herein, we demonstrate that these TCV observations are consistent with runaway pitch angle scattering through resonant interaction of their gyromotion with the toroidal magnetic field ripple. A pitch angle diffusion operator [3] is introduced in fluid-kinetic DREAM simulations [4], predicting strong scattering at a resonant momentum (p/(me c)~45) reached by the most energetic runaways. Synchrotron power losses increase with pitch angle, yielding net deceleration of the scattered runaways after which these are re-accelerated to the ripple resonance. Ripple interaction can thus act as an energy limiter. The ripple hypothesis is tested experimentally in TCV by exploiting the decrease in p during a toroidal magnetic field ramp down. Multi-wavelength multi-view imaging data from MANTIS indicates momentum-space behaviour in agreement with modelling. This highlights the importance of accounting for runaway-ripple interaction in interpreting present-day tokamak runaway experiments, and demonstrates the explanatory and predictive power of state-of-the-art kinetic runaway models.
[1] M. Hoppe et al. Nuclear Fusion 9, 60 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aba371
[2] T.A. Wijkamp et al. Nuclear Fusion 4, 61 (2021). doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abe8af
[3] B. Kurzan et al. Physical Review Letters 25, 75 (1995). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4626
[4] M. Hoppe et al. Computer Physics Communications, 268 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108098